Re: uvm_swap compression patch
Takashi YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:50:07 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKDaYtDX0-TK2JB+c7-xm4fdg+LyvRE=Xh4gbWk7En8pGoyGww@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 7:22=E2=80=AFPM Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]>= wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 04:54:00PM +0900, Takashi YAMAMOTO wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 4:04=E2=80=AFAM Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud@netbsd.= org> wrote: > > > as part of a compressed ram experiment I'd like to try, I've first cl= eaned up > > > the current uvm swap support for I noticed that the support for encry= pted swap > > > became distributed and not logical anymore. In the attached patch I'v= e > > > contracted the encrypted support into the /dev/drum device and remove= d it from > > > the specific swap support and callbacks. > > > > with the cost of an extra allocation for the common case? > > (just a question) > > That should be patched in v2. i meant getiobuf in swstrategy. v2 looks same. > > With regards, > Reinoud >