Re: ZFS tunable parameters

Greg Troxel <[email protected]> writes:

> Brad Spencer <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I left the ARC setting stock and performed my usual abuse build testing
>> and I can say with certainly that it performed as one would expect.  No
>> lock ups and while swapping was higher than with the adjustments
>> mentioned in the patch, that would have been expected.  The system
>> performed perfectly under pretty high memory pressure.
>
> That is great news.  I expect that 11 will behave the same way, as I
> think all the fixes have been pulled up (a while ago)
>

[snip]

I expected that to be the case, given what I noted in source-changes,
but I just tested it and 11_RC6 behaved pretty much like -current when
subjected to the same abuse test.



-- 
Brad Spencer - [email protected]