Re: TCP connection and "Host is down"
Robert Swindells <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Index: netinet/sctp_output.c >>>> [...] >> >>> looks good. I bet that it will help 73% of the 0 people using SCTP, >>> [...] >> >> Now now. I know people who work at a company whose principal product >> is layered atop SCTP. They're currently using Linux (who isn't? grr), >> but if NetBSD doesn't have working SCTP, it can't ever have any users. > > Thanks for the data point. I agree SCTP working is nicer, and meant > that absent anyone responding to a call for testing, the patch looks > like an improvement. I couldn't see how to generate the EHOSTDOWN error for a period of time to be able to test the patch, it looks reasonable though.