Re: tap interface detached
Frédéric Fauberteau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert Swindells wrote: > Frédéric Fauberteau <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am trying to install a Xen domU and I am reproducing a working >> configuration for NetBSD 9.0 amd64 from a running host. >> >> I create a tunnel interface: >> >> # ifconfig tap0 create >> # ifconfig tap0 inet 192.168.0.1 up >> >> I add this interface to a bridge: >> >> # ifconfig bridge0 create >> # brconfig bridge0 add tap0 up >> >> The tap interface appears to be detached: > > You need to add something else to the bridge that has a carrier signal, > the simplest configuration would be to add the outgoing interface of the > dom0. Yes, I created the domU and a virtual interface had been added to the bridge: # brconfig bridge0 bridge0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> Configuration: priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 ipfilter disabled flags 0x0 Interfaces: xvif1i0 flags=3<LEARNING,DISCOVER> port 6 priority 128 tap0 flags=3<LEARNING,DISCOVER> port 4 priority 128 Address cache (max cache: 100, timeout: 1200): 00:16:3e:26:13:02 xvif1i0 1182 flags=0<> But the tap interface is still detached: # ifconfig tap0 tap0: flags=0x8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ec_capabilities=0x5<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU> ec_enabled=0x1<VLAN_MTU> description: "Xen VM tunnel" address: f2:0b:a4:fb:22:75 status: no carrier inet6 fe80::f00b:a4ff:fefb:2275%tap0/64 flags 0x8<DETACHED> scopeid 0x4 inet6 2001:bc8:3807:101::1/64 flags 0x8<DETACHED> inet 192.168.0.1/24 broadcast 192.168.0.255 flags 0x4<DETACHED>