Re: ipv6 gateway on different subnet
Christof Meerwald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:31:58PM -0600, Peter Miller wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:01:48 +0100 > Christof Meerwald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The main difference is that I don't see a neighbor solicitation from > > the router for the VPS's IPv6 address - maybe that was already > > somehow triggered when adding the IP address? > > > > Could you re-run it one more time and make sure you start the tcpdump > > before adding the new IP address? > > > > It looks like there is a neighbor solicitation from the router this time around. And comparing the neighbor advertisements: Debian > 10:33:23.197053 00:16:3e:d7:cf:50 > d8:67:d9:58:3d:1b, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 86: (hlim 255, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 32) 2602:fed2:7116:d82c::5 > fe80::da67:d9ff:fe58:3d1b: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, neighbor advertisement, length 32, tgt is 2602:fed2:7116:d82c::5, Flags [solicited, override] NetBSD > 05:01:13.467620 00:16:3e:d7:cf:50 > d8:67:d9:58:3d:1b, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 86: (hlim 255, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 32) fe80::216:3eff:fed7:cf50 > fe80::da67:d9ff:fe58:3d1b: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, neighbor advertisement, length 32, tgt is 2602:fed2:7116:d82c::6, Flags [solicited, override] I am seeing this difference: 2602:fed2:7116:d82c::5 > fe80::da67:d9ff:fe58:3d1b vs. fe80::216:3eff:fed7:cf50 > fe80::da67:d9ff:fe58:3d1b Christof -- https://cmeerw.org sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org