Re: happy eyesockets
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) writes: > [email protected] (Greg Troxel) writes: > >>I don't object and I think you have a good point, but what do the >>standards say? > > RFC1122 describes how to handle ICMP messages and distinguishes > between soft errors (event gets registered, but protocol continues) > and hard errors (a TCP connection is aborted). As I understand you, the proposed chagne is noncompilant, and thus presumptively shouldn't go in. Is that how you see it?