Re: TCP RFC 6298 RTO handling
Kevin Bowling <[email protected]> Wed, 20 May 2026 20:25:15 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK7dMtC31bMtnnBqxU=D-CM5fW5vK+Zcw7wduQy+0V9-+Y64ZQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 11:43=E2=80=AFAM Nick Hudson <[email protected]= > wrote: > > On 20/05/2026 02:24, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > Versus the LoC, this is a high value change that improves TCP > > performance in common [, tail] loss situations. > > https://www.netbsd.org/~kbowling/tcp-rfc6298.patch > > LGTM Committed, thanks! > > > Even on high latency links, 1s is a good long while and a spurious RTO > > may be profitable since links are generally less bandwidth constrained > > while latency is what it is if you are dealing with tail loss in a > > buffering scheme. > > Regards, > > Kevin Bowling >