Re: Rebasing x11/motif on actively maintained fork
David Brownlee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.packages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGN_6pZTw+HV0vg9kFPSZFkSySTudAOdapEkzD_XjZ-HFeGBQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 19:48, Paolo Vincenzo Olivo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Upstream Motif hasn't seen activity in nearly 3 years. > https://sourceforge.net/p/motif/code/ci/master/tree/ > > On one hand, I favor slow-paced development and I'm ok with periods > of inactivity. In addition, the niche of Motif applications doesn't > exactly overlap with that of cutting edge software. > > On the other hand, I bumped across this actively maintained fork, > which published a major release just a month ago: > https://github.com/thentenaar/motif/releases > > The rationale behind this fork is explained in the project's homepage: > > > This fork of Motif was born of a desire to keep Motif (and other X11 > > technologies) alive and well. The original upstream Sourceforge project > > hasn't had any activity in over two years, none of the project admins > > have been active for at least that amount of time, the official bug > > tracker has disappeared into the void; and the user forum was closed way > > back in 2017. Sadly, it appears that the original upstream has abandoned > > the project. > > > I've incorporated some fixes from upstream that have laid dormant for > > years, a few others from Gentoo, and made a few improvements of my own. > > I intend to maintain this fork, and in doing so advocate for the > > continued use of the user interface toolkit that defined an era, and > > influenced many of the user interfaces that came after it > > v2.4.0 seems to bring many enhancements and bug fixes over 2.3.8 so it > may be worth taking a look at it, testing it with some applications and > evaluate the possibility of moving x11/motif to such fork. I haven't > done this myself, and can't tell whether it would break any package > depending on it, but I would give it a shot if there's any interest in > it. Sounds like it might be worth adding to pkgsrc-wip for people to test. Do you know if any other distributions are using it? Thanks David