Re: heads up RE autoconf C23 vs legacy code

Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> writes:

> I wonder if we should start committing the generated files to CVS.
> For example, I don't expect another release of scmcvs, so we should be
> safe to generate them now and then never touch them again.

That goes against the "vendored code bad" principle.   We'd also not get
bugfixes to autoconf.

I wonder if svmcvs works with devel/autconf213 :-) But seriously there's
269, and repointing to that seems easy.   Well, it needs a tools name,
but not that hard.

I can reproduce a failure by adding GCC_REQD+=14 on NetBSD 10.  No
surprise.