Re: heads up RE autoconf C23 vs legacy code
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Jul 2026 19:40:59 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.packages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I wonder if we should start committing the generated files to CVS. >> > For example, I don't expect another release of scmcvs, so we should be >> > safe to generate them now and then never touch them again. >> >> That goes against the "vendored code bad" principle. We'd also not get >> bugfixes to autoconf. > > I was not talking about the ones that just come with a configure.ac > and we have to generate everything. > > I meant the ones where we patch a Makefile.am or configure.ac, which > is, I think, the bigger part. I am not following what you mean to do.