Re: Some LFS vs. FFS+softdep testresults
Rick Kelly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Frank van der Linden said: >A preliminary conclusion is that LFS is now pretty stable for normal >usage (although I didn't create any disk-nearly-full situations >which make LFS' life hard), and then it does quite well. The write >case is worth some investigation. I think it is fair to say that LFS is getting to a point where we don't need to worry about jfs, xfs, ext3fs, etc. Add some tools for growing and shrinking... -- Rick Kelly [email protected] www.rmkhome.com