Re: Some LFS vs. FFS+softdep testresults

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Frank van der Linden wrote:
> A preliminary conclusion is that LFS is now pretty stable for normal
> usage (although I didn't create any disk-nearly-full situations
> which make LFS' life hard), and then it does quite well. The write
> case is worth some investigation.

What about NFS-exporting LFS? Seems this didn't work at all in 1.6(.x),
and I thus had to move some disks back to UFS recently. :(


 - Hubert

-- 
Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
* Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial.html
* Setup  -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial.html
Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD.org/