Re: mmap(2) performance netbsd-1-6 vs. -current
enami tsugutomo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> (In your first test, you were still performing the mapping operations, > you just weren't faulting in any pages except the first one.) There was no fault even in the first mapping. And since the first one isn't unmapped (ptr[0] is 0xdeadbeef), number of mapping increases on each outer iteration. So, the time difference in the first test is also due to map entry merging, I guess. enami.