Re: mmap(2) performance netbsd-1-6 vs. -current

enami tsugutomo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> (In your first test, you were still performing the mapping operations, 
> you just weren't faulting in any pages except the first one.)

There was no fault even in the first mapping.  And since the first one
isn't unmapped (ptr[0] is 0xdeadbeef), number of mapping increases on
each outer iteration.  So, the time difference in the first test is
also due to map entry merging, I guess.

enami.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.