LFS or FFS, which one is the more reliable and faster file system
"Shen Lily" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
LFS or FFS, which one is the more reliable and faster file system in terms of recovery from system failure? Now I am studying the recovery performance comparison of the NetBSD Log-structured File System and the NetBSD Fast File System. From some papers I know that LFS offers superior performance, but my test results don t provide the proof . LFS isnt faster and more reliable than FFS, sometimes it is even worse. I dont know why does this happen? Are results of my test wrong? Will you please give me some direction? ps: System description: Intel motherboard 2.4Ghz Pentium 4 512M of DDR333 memory On wd0, I created a partition wd0f and wd0g for test, using 1000M size,1024b fragment size, and 8192b block size. wd0f had its type changed and was prepared using newfs(8) or newfs_lfs(8). _________________________________________________________________ 浜ㄤ涓澶х靛欢绯荤 MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com