Re: PostgreSQL
Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:04:12 +1030
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general,gmane.os.netbsd.current |
|---|---|
| Organization | The NetBSD Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, 2 February 2006 at 0:06:35 +0000, Marcin Jessa wrote: > Hi guys. > > I read some emails on one of the FreeBSD mailings list about MySQL > performance on FreeBSD vs Linux and it seems like Linux performs > better compared to FreeBSD 4.x and 6.x with different threading > models. There are some benchmarks avaliable but unfortunatelly they > do not include NetBSD. For those of you who don't know, one of my other hats is being a developer for MySQL. Unlike FreeBSD, NetBSD is not a "fully supported" platform for MySQL. If anybody wants to change that, I'll do what I can to help. > Now, my O.S of choice is NetBSD and my open source database of > choice is PostgreSQL. I am working on a project which will use a > pretty buisy database with many simultanous selects, inserts and > update queries running on 64-bit Opteron CPU's. I have little > experience with running buisy databases and I basically used MySQL > for things like small scale email services, user authentication with > radius and web frontends (couple of hundred users). I was wondering > if any of you have experience with PostgreSQL's performance on > NetBSD 3.0 or CURRENT compared to other open source O.S's. What > threading model will be used and how does database generally perform > on NetBSD? Please be honest, I promice not to cry if you suggest a > different O.S :) I'll follow the discussion with interest :-) Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD4VOEIubykFB6QiMRAjseAKCYE4gvnEnzhu8K3t9jDuWa8kJkVACfUsGX NjAtAFPXfidZ3IUGSxxQ4ks= =EasO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----