Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Tony Bourke <[email protected]> Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:19:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance,gmane.os.netbsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
changing MTU won't help really. it would also cause lots of other problems (= like fragmentation over your Internet connection) and every device on your d= eity would need to be set for the same MTU. Plus you should be able to push w= ay more bandwidth without it. higher MTUs used to be a way to increase perfo= rmance for things like iSCSI but that's not really the case anymore, even wi= th 10 Gigabit Ethernet. So even 10 gigabit environments choose not to do jum= bo frames.=20 If your network card is PCI, your bandwidth will be limited to about 200-250= megabits per second (which is about 25-35 MBytes/s) because of the bus spee= d. PCIe will handle full duplex 1 gigabit no problem. Tony Sent from my iPhone On Oct 9, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:38:50PM +0530, Ravishankar S wrote: >> Thanks to all who replied. dd now shows 67 MB/sec!!. However, i have >> another question. I can now ftp @ 25 MB/sec and it never increases >> beyond this point. I have a dlink gigabit router and gigabit cards on >> both ends. client is an ubuntu laptop >=20 > What does ifconfig -a shows ? You can also test network speed with > a tool like ttcp, is't more usefull to explore network performances > than ftp (which mixes performances of different subsystems). >=20 > Note that not all gigabit network adapters or switches can support a > sustainted link-rate traffic, but 25MB/s looks low anyway >=20 >> Any other areas to explore to increase throughput? I see MTU set at >> both ends at 1500 - any benefits to increasing it to 3000 - this will >> enable jumbo frames automatically?? >=20 > It should. >=20 > --=20 > Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> > NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference > --