RE: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.

The following reply was made to PR pkg/60138; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marcin Gondek <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
	<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Adam Ciarcinski
	<[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 16:06:08 +0000

 Hi Adam,
 
 Could you take a look on that? If I look correctly the commit comes from yo=
 u.
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 --
 Marcin Gondek / Drixter
 http://fido.e-utp.net/
 AS56662
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf=
  Of Kimmo Suominen via gnats
 Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 8:05 AM
 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];=
  Marcin Gondek <[email protected]>
 Cc: [email protected]
 Subject: Re: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 
 The following reply was made to PR pkg/60138; it has been noted by GNATS.
 
 From: Kimmo Suominen <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected]
 Cc:=20
 Subject: Re: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 09:02:36 +0300
 
  Hi Marcin,
 =20
  On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 02:34:00PM +0000, Marcin Gondek wrote:
  > Maybe it's worth to back to old version v33.5 or newer in that v33  > la=
 yout, so v33.6 and not go to v34.1?
 =20
  If the only reason for v34.1 is that "it is the latest," then I'm  incline=
 d to agree with sticking to v33 for now.
 =20
  However, I'm not the maintainer of protobuf in pkgsrc, and it only  gets p=
 ulled into my builds because of mosh.  A quick cursory test  run of mosh re=
 vealed no issues.
 =20
  Kind regards,
  + Kimmo
 =20