RE: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.

"Marcin Gondek via gnats" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following reply was made to PR pkg/60138; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marcin Gondek <[email protected]>
To: Adam <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
	<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
	<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 06:36:31 +0000

 Hi Adam,
 
 Works for GCC_REQD=3D14 too.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --
 Marcin Gondek / Drixter
 http://fido.e-utp.net/
 AS56662
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf=
  Of Marcin Gondek
 Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 11:24 PM
 To: Adam <[email protected]>
 Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; =
 [email protected]; [email protected]
 Subject: ODP: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 
 Hi Adam,
 
 Works for GCC_REQD=3D13.
 Now checking with GCC_REQD=3D14.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --
 Marcin Gondek / Drixter
 http://fido.e-utp.net/
 AS56662
 
 ________________________________________
 Od:=A0Marcin Gondek <[email protected]>
 Wys=B3ane:=A0poniedzia=B3ek, 30 marca 2026 22:48
 Do:=A0Adam <[email protected]>
 DW:[email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]=
  <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>;=
  [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <kim@netbs=
 d.org>
 Temat:=A0ODP: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 =A0
 Hi Adam,
 
 Testing right now with GCC_REQD=3D13.
 It will take a while, because I don't have GCC13 yet.
 
 I'll reply once it will be done and then try with 14 too.
 
 Thanks,
 --
 Marcin Gondek / Drixter
 http://fido.e-utp.net/
 AS56662
 
 ________________________________________
 Od:=A0Adam <[email protected]>
 Wys=B3ane:=A0poniedzia=B3ek, 30 marca 2026 18:50
 Do:=A0Marcin Gondek <[email protected]>
 DW:[email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]=
  <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>;=
  [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <kim@netbs=
 d.org>
 Temat:=A0Re: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 =A0
 There is an issue for that upstream https://github.com/protocolbuffers/prot=
 obuf/issues/26383
 
 Protobuf requires C++17, so let's don't bump USE_CXX_FEATURES to c++23.
 
 Can you try to set GCC_REQD=3D14 (or 13)=A0in the Makefile and try again? O=
 f course, that will pull lang/gcc14.
 
 Kind regards,
 Adam
 
 
 > Hi Adam,
 >
 > Could you take a look on that? If I look correctly the commit comes from =
 you.
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 >
 > --
 > Marcin Gondek / Drixter
 > http://fido.e-utp.net/
 > AS56662
 >
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Beha=
 lf Of Kimmo Suominen via gnats
 > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 8:05 AM
 > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]=
 g; Marcin Gondek <[email protected]>
 > Cc: [email protected]
 > Subject: Re: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 >
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/60138; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Kimmo Suominen <[email protected]>
 > To: [email protected]
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: pkg/60138: protobuf-34.1 is not compiling on AMD64 for me.
 > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 09:02:36 +0300
 >
 > Hi Marcin,
 >
 > On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 02:34:00PM +0000, Marcin Gondek wrote:
 >> Maybe it's worth to back to old version v33.5 or newer in that v33=A0 > =
 layout, so v33.6 and not go to v34.1?
 >
 > If the only reason for v34.1 is that "it is the latest," then I'm=A0 incl=
 ined to agree with sticking to v33 for now.
 >
 > However, I'm not the maintainer of protobuf in pkgsrc, and it only=A0 get=
 s pulled into my builds because of mosh.=A0 A quick cursory test=A0 run of =
 mosh revealed no issues.
 >
 > Kind regards,
 > + Kimmo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.