RE: non-blocking dependencies

"Larson, Timothy E." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general
Message-ID <226316B3E1F749498E28ACA66321D5BA01318FA3F7@oma00cexmbx03.corp.westworlds.com>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:18:19PM -0600, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
> > Is there a way to mark a dependency as non-critical, and won't
> stop
> > the build if it doesn't exist?
> 
> No. The concept of "optional" dependencies is IMO obscure at best.

I just gave two concrete examples of their usefulness.

If I could guarantee dependencies' availability, that would be great, but I can't.  I can't get doxygen to build on my primary pkgsrc box, which is Solaris 9.  Anything that depends on doxygen is "broken" even though I'd probably only lose documentation.  I can live without documentation if I have to.  So far, I've been putting the build dependency in an ugly if-not-SunOS block.  

I understand it would probably add a lot more complexity to pkgsrc if implemented, though.


Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.