Re: buildlink3.mk vs builtin.mk

Thomas Klausner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.packages,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
> Some of my package's dependencies have a builtin.mk as well as a buildlink3.mk.  Should I include the former instead of the latter in my package's Makefile? Other packages' Makefiles have CHECK_BUILTIN.pkgname set around the include, but I can't find documentation describing this. I could try blindly following the examples, but I'd prefer to understand. Reading the Pkgsrc Guide is not very illuminating on this point.

In a package Makefile, only include buildlink3.mk.
The builtin.mk files will be handled automatically by the
infrastructure.
 Thomas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.