Re: CVS commit: wip/bzr
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm just curious the behavior of bzr. That's why
testing with
devel/bzr-2.1.1
wip/bzr-2.3.4
wip/bzr-2.4.1 (I've modified)
Shall I just update wip/2.3.4 to 2.4.1 ?
The real question is what would bettter serve the pkgsrc-wip user. I
would guess 2.4.1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6Fu6MACgkQ+vesoDJhHiWhmgCgkZ6zCakRfKulWNEDDJlYolj+ mDAAn0vKDwCx456enmOSZPawUqakPi+v =jG5L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----