Re: NO_[SRC|BIN]_ON_CDROM
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Larson, Timothy E." <[email protected]> writes: > And as I said, this is a general/theoretical question now. The > authors of my package have agreed on a license. My point is that unless the author grants a license which clearly permits something, we code NO_*_ON_* to prohibit it. So we are simply not in the business of interpreting intent. If someone grants permission to distribute verbatim copies at no charge, then that knocks out NO_BIN_ON_* due to derived works not being expressly permitted, and NO_*_ON_CDROM due to no permission to charge for copies. The way you asked them to use a clear license is exemplary, and ideally we'd ask authors of all packges that have non-standard and unclear licenses to resolve the situation, but in practice this is a lot of work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9FWacACgkQ+vesoDJhHiXFEgCdGjtJ03wmYOJfPaP7geo0hNrW T+YAoKhaxxYIu6NJms0WMAsaOkB6X5uN =cmfC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----