Re: wip/libreoffice: Why cups dependency?
Mayuresh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 12:39:26AM +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:01:37PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > Mayuresh wrote: > > > >Is there any way wip/libreoffice can be built sans cups? > > > > > > Probably, but then it won't be able to print anything. > > > > > > What is the issue you're trying to solve here ? > > > > Firstly, I am unable to build cups. Posted separate mail on that. > > > > The issues with cups dependency are: > > > > 1. One may not want printing support at all. Why build cups unnecessarily > > then? > > Because compared to the size of LibreOffice, CUPS is a non-issue and as > such doesn't warrant the additional complexity? Ok. What about choice of lpd vs cups? What is the additional complexity anyway? Mayuresh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev