Re: Mesa status ?
iMil <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.packages,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi François, > I've recently started to update many X11 packages; my goal here is to be able > to someday run a KMS based xf86-video-intel driver and use Xorg on recent > hardware. wow, that would indeed be great; have you seen this: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2012/03/11/msg019462.html ? > On the other hand, the 7.8.2 version in wip/ works perfectly with what we > have in pkgsrc right now. Well, to be pefectly honest, the only reason why I'm investigating is because I'd really like to have the famous r600_dri working, 7.8.2 have those so that's OK for me, but I was wondering what effort would it take to push it to 7.11.2. > I'd like to see 7.8.2 moved to pkgsrc and 7.4.4 removed; we could then work > on putting 8.0.2 and newer versions in pkgsrc-wip and updating the rest of > the x11 packages. 100% agree on that. > The most pressing needs are x11/xproto (see PR #45465) and > modular-xorg-server (a newer version is available in wip/) Is it needed by Mesa 7.8 or only 8.0 ? > I don't understand the need to create sub-packages either; having one big > MesaLib one similar to upstream would prevent unnecessary work IMHO. Agreed. - ------------------------------------------- Emile "iMil" Heitor .°. <[email protected]> _ http://gcu-squad.org ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML email X & vCards / \ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFPuhvkFG3BlGWyzUIRAiv4AJsFdDye83892JELb8B9CwzWZzvJzACePVpi uAmTL7huD7TrLeS0JOyWdvE= =4mgR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----