Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet

David Holland <[email protected]> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:50:47AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>  > (It seems obvious to me that git is the only reasonable choice
>  > these days, but perhaps that's not the common view here.)
>
> I don't see that. AFAICT the typical reaction to it around here lately
> is that its UI is unpardonably awful.

I agree with the critcism.  But I've come to the conclusion for work
that the best approach overall is to use git and make people learn it
(to the point of having multiple all-day classes).  We've used rebasing
and history rewriting, and I don't think we could have done taht with
other systems.

Point taken that there is not consensus or even close.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlAIP6oACgkQ+vesoDJhHiUYsACbBcNbBIpYdPPru9kBXRaaCWTL
NAMAniibXj5Q0Kic+syBNsXkz8Uq0glJ
=mCsE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----