git-package and friends
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:38:34 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(speaking as an individual, with pkgsrc-pmc hat off)
It's seeming to me that are an increasing number of packages out there
where the source bits are in svn, git, hg, cvs.
We have mk/{svn,git,hg,cvs}-package.mk in wip, and my
not-very-well-considered impression is that these need some spiffing up
before it's reasonable to start the "should they move to pkgsrc proper"
debate. As an example, git-package uses -r/-D (svn/cvs commands), and
this doesn't work.
So I wonder if anyone here considers themselves the expert and would be
willing to send a note explaining what's good and bad about the current
state of *VCS-package.mk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlC+QyoACgkQ+vesoDJhHiX3eQCfdmC7UEKx85+FbboKCE/whaC8 /uIAoIiS5DKlMk7a8YtE72jGjV/gRNB1 =kygN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----