Re: pkgsrc: wip/{audacious,audacious-plugins}
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.review |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Johann Franz <[email protected]> writes: > Do we have an official guideline on what goes into pkgsrc-wip? Thanks > for the detailed explanation, but I fear it'll get lost in the > archives. Unlike GIMP, Audacious' release process seems to proceed at > a very fast pace, so I figure a seperate -devel package wouldn't be > too prolific. There are no real guidelines, other than normal pkgsrc rules and that non-developers can commit. I don't see what fast has to do with it. If the latest stable is packaged, and perhaps also an unstable version, then stable gets updated on new declaration and unstable often. > I'm not going to downgrade only to upgrade it again in a few days. > If anyone wants to do so, please go ahead and take the maintainership. > Same for the splitting up of the plug-ins/modules into seperate packages. Perhaps add a comment in plug-ins about this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/