Re: please review baler and eor

On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 16:47:34 -0600
"Larson, Timothy E." <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't have ruby installed on my Sol9 box so I didn't look at baler,
> but did try building eor.  It failed when prereq cmake didn't build.
> It bootstraps, then died at 22% of the next stage with a lot of
> curses errors.  I'm using GCCfss 4.2.
> 
> Tim
> 

curses problems - it reminds me of my recent troubles that NetBSD's
curses (/usr/include) clashed with ncurses from pkgsrc.

It was resolved by setting

INCOMPAT_CURSES=        NetBSD-*-*
in the packages's Makefile

Could you please try this in cmake's Makefile on your Solaris box?
Actually, it may be Solaris-*-* or sth like that.

However, from devel/ncurses/builtin.mk I don't understand if this would
help for Solaris.

###

If this doesn't help, then you might try

PREFER.ncurses = pkgsrc

in mk.conf

###

I had also experienced outdated ncursesw includes (PR 43435) which has
been fixed in summer. (pkgsrc-2010Q3 should be right though)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl