Re: Please review wip/libreoffice

Greg Troxel <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:14:13 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.review
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  The wip/libreoffice package now installs out of the box on both 
  DragonFly and NetBSD-5.1.
  The build fails on NetBSD-6 but this is caused by a runtime error which 
  also occurs without the pkgsrc framework.

  To my knowledge, there are no more packaging issues and this package can 
  be moved to the main pkgsrc repository.

That's great news.  I don't have time this week to look at it, but will
kick off a buidl.  I wonder about a larger issue:

  is the libreoffice package sufficiently stable, that for most users,
  they are better off with libreoffice than openoffice (as found in
  pkgsrc)?

There's no reason the answer has to be yes to move wip/libreoffice to
main pkgsrc - but I'm curious since I've had the impression for a while
that libreoffice was the future.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+FZ4UACgkQ+vesoDJhHiVFOACfVEVLJx/XfNvJS6YboVNAyxZR
f7IAoKxZQeIU3+GbA8yUr+JFvJKKmwiB
=Qtkz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----