Re: Please review wip/libreoffice
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:14:13 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.review |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The wip/libreoffice package now installs out of the box on both DragonFly and NetBSD-5.1. The build fails on NetBSD-6 but this is caused by a runtime error which also occurs without the pkgsrc framework. To my knowledge, there are no more packaging issues and this package can be moved to the main pkgsrc repository. That's great news. I don't have time this week to look at it, but will kick off a buidl. I wonder about a larger issue: is the libreoffice package sufficiently stable, that for most users, they are better off with libreoffice than openoffice (as found in pkgsrc)? There's no reason the answer has to be yes to move wip/libreoffice to main pkgsrc - but I'm curious since I've had the impression for a while that libreoffice was the future. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+FZ4UACgkQ+vesoDJhHiVFOACfVEVLJx/XfNvJS6YboVNAyxZR f7IAoKxZQeIU3+GbA8yUr+JFvJKKmwiB =Qtkz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----