Re: Please review wip/armadillo

Thanks for the suggestions.  MKL and ACML are closed-source BLAS/LAPACK 
implementations from Intel and AMD, so I just removed the reference to 
them from DESCR.

On 11/18/12 8:44 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> DESCR says that lapack is optional, but the dependency on lapack is hardcoded.
> Consider packaging its other options (MKL and ACML) if they're not already and
> if it's not too much trouble. Then, utilize the options framework to allow the
> user to tailor the build of armadillo.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jason W. Bacon
[email protected]
http://personalpages.tds.net/~jwbacon
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov