Re: please review wip/polarssl
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:02:38 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.review |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tim Larson <[email protected]> writes: [polarssl] > Any other comments? If not, would someone kindly import it before Q4 branch? I looked at and it seems mostly ok. 'make test' fails with many lines like - test_suite_pbkdf2 Shared object "libpolarssl.so.0" not found either with the package installed or without. It seems the build system doesn't use autoconf/libtool and doesn't cope with doing the things people who say autoconf is too compliated forget about :-) But serious, in tests/Makefile: LDFLAGS += -L../library -lpolarssl $(SYS_LDFLAGS) there is no RPATH handling. It doesn't seem fair to hold up import on this (instead of just disabling the test target), since we don't require tests, but it seems fixable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDCBQ4ACgkQ+vesoDJhHiVBKwCgjVm+IBQ5dBape9Figz5vmgdo JT8AoI3k6RRF9S8ADYpJKmhL18xk2x+0 =+23F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----