Re: wip/hylafax-devel 4.3.0 rc1 - please test package

On Apr 20, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Andreas Hallmann wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:05:14AM -0700, Min Sik Kim wrote:
>> On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Andreas Hallmann wrote:
>>
>>> HI all,
>>>
>>> I upgraded hylafax-devel to the new release-candidate.
>>
>> Any reason to set its pkgname to "hylafax-devel"?  It seems that this
>> package conflicts with comm/hylafax anyway, so why don't you just
>> keep it as "hylafax"?
>
> Well, "wip/hylafax-devel" is to follow the line of development of  
> hylafax.
> I.e. testing of snapshots, betas, alphas. Only of interest for  
> hylafax developers.
> Therefore hylafax-devel.

I'm not objecting to keeping the development version of hylafax.   
What I don't like is its PKGNAME.  See mail/mutt and mail/mutt-devel  
for example.  Although they have different directory names, their  
package name is "mutt".  Unless you make hylafax-devel installable  
with hylafax (non-development version) without conflicts, you should  
either add CONFLICTS to both packages or make them have the same  
package name (hylafax).  I think the latter would be better.

Regards,
Min Sik Kim



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642