Re: hardlinks to setuid binaries
David Holland <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Mar 2022 20:35:10 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YkIb/[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:42:31PM +1100, matthew green wrote: > i don't see the benefit of a special mode/flag on a subdir to > allow this. as a normal user, i can create setuid to me and > i think that's a fine think to allow. You could imagine two flags, one for root and one settable by users that allows a directory to contain objects setuid to the directory owner or setgid to the directory group. (like the two immutable flags) It's more obviously useful for device nodes, since the only times when device nodes belong anywhere except /dev (and a chroot tree's /dev) are very specific arrangements established explicitly by the sysadmin. Plenty of compat issues to figure out before trying to deploy either, though. (though I don't see where even the setuid flag interferes with updating base and in pkgsrc it'll only interfere with the small number of packages that build in destdir but not user-destdir mode) -- David A. Holland [email protected]