RE: NetBSD 1.6 & i386 SMP, ACPI, mly
"Conrad T. Pino" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.smp,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brett, > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Lymn [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 20:00 > To: Conrad T. Pino > Cc: 'Brett Lymn'; 'Manuel Bouyer'; 'i386 Port'; 'SMP' > Subject: Re: NetBSD 1.6 & i386 SMP, ACPI, mly > > What it tells you is that NetBSD SMP works well for some people. > This, at least, gives you hope that you can get something working. > Whether or not it will work well for you is something that you will > probably need to find out yourself by trying it. Thank you. I appreciate the suggestion. > Just as another datapoint, I am running SMP on my main machine at > home. I have had a couple of panics (one while doing a large copy > over the network to another machine, another when I was trying to feed > part /usr/src/sys into Coda), the last panic seemed to be fixed by > updating my kernel sources and booting a new kernel. I _am_ happy > with the SMP work, it rocks. But there are lurking bugs there which > would give me pause recommending it for production. Over time these > bugs are being found and fixed, people running SMP and feeding back > the crashes is the best way to accelerate the process of making NetBSD > SMP production ready. So, run SMP where it won't hurt you but play > conservative when your arse is on the line :-) OK. I want to help. Can you steer me to documentation that explains how "feeding back the crashes" takes place? Can you steer me to documentation on how to setup a system to auto reboot after a panic? > I agree with Thor on this, NetBSD is probably not going to be a good > fit for that application much as it pains me to say so. Perhaps you > should investigate hardening your base Linux platform so that it is > not so easily hacked. I'm using Solaris 8 Intel for now. I would like to see these perceived short comings overcome. I prefer to spend my extra time on NetBSD rather than Linux. I assume Tomcat 4 is not the high risk area. Oracle is the likely problem area. What can I do to help advance the cause and ease your pain? > -- > Brett Lymn Conrad Pino