Re: Dell PowerEdge 8450
David Burren <[email protected]> Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:18:13 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Toru Nishimura" <[email protected]> wrote: > > His lab tested HT servers and concluded _the_ HT SMP Linux kernel > implementation scales actually worse, at least no better, than > plain SMP kernel. It sounded HT is rather waste of transistor > and electricity. My understanding is that HT can be beneficial if you have a model where you can avoid having threads from separate processes running on the same physical CPU. Given that this requires the use of multithreaded applications in your performance critical path to get any advantage, and a scheduler that distinguishes between virtual and physical CPUs, then without both of those yes I'd agree it's a waste of time. But I'm sure there's an application for it _somewhere_... ;) Does anyone know of a scheduler (in any OS) that is HT-aware in this way? __ David Burren