Re: dmesg From PowerEdge 8450
"Thomas T. Thai" <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:12:39 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Husemann wrote: >>cpu0: features 383fbff<PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX> >> >> > ~~~~~ > >The Page Segement Extensions (IIRC) allow the mapping of a 36 bit wide >physical address range into the virtual 32bit addresss range. > >There is no support for using this extension in NetBSD yet (and I have >zero clue how intrusive that would be) > Thank you for the explanation. This means that if I have 8 processors in there sharing 4 Gig of ram, that doesn't leave much RAM per processor. I did wonder why Dell suggested 4 Gigs per CPU when it came to configuring the PowerEdge 8450. It makes sense now. Do our cousins (FreeBSD, OpenBSD) or even Linux have the 4 Gig RAM limit on i386 platform? If they don't, how did they work around it? Regards, Thomas