Re: Different speed CPUs show up as same speed
Rick Kelly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ken Seefried said: >AFAIK...the Sequents were closely coupled SMP on a given board (and always >had the same CPU speeds on a given board), but between boards it was a >loosely coupled MP affair. Thus it was easier to have boards of different >speeds, as stepping issues, etc., didn't come into play. I believe that is correct. >Anyone with really good memory remember if the Balances had different CPU >speeds? The Balance machines, I believe. could only have 1 cpu speed. Two boxes that I maintained were Balance machines that were upgraded to Symmetry. They had 16 386/16 and 4 386/20 processors each. One of these boxes had 350 users logged in on average during the day as well as running multiple Progress databases and a news server. Interactive response was amazing. And then there was a Symmetry S2000 box that had 4 486/50 processors in a much smaller case (but it still had blinkin' lights :-) that was evem more powerful than the Symmetry S81 boxes. Of course, for $500k it should be. Sequent had NUMA, clustering, and good mutex libraries long before other UNIX vendors even thought of it. -- Rick Kelly [email protected] www.rmkhome.com