Re: python libraries vs. RPATH (vs. RUNPATH)
Martin Husemann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 01:10:14AM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > This works on a recentish current where lib-dynload/readline.so has > RPATH instead of RUNPATH. > > I vaguely remember we had a bit of a discussion abour RPATH > vs. RUNPATH a few years ago. Does anyone remember off-hand if the > relevant fixes made it to -8? Not offhand but I knew where to look ;-) RCS file: /cvsroot/src/libexec/ld.elf_so/headers.c,v Working file: headers.c head: 1.70 [..] netbsd-9-2-RELEASE: 1.65.2.1 [..] netbsd-8: 1.61.0.8 [..] ---------------------------- revision 1.65 date: 2018-12-30 12:55:15 +0100; author: martin; state: Exp; lines: +3 -2; commitid: OsrLtEI8DqY6KO5B; branches: 1.65.2; Add support for DT_RUNPATH - it is just the same as we always have treated DT_RPATH. Approved by core. ---------------------------- and according to my grep in 8's doc/CHANGES-* it has not been pulled up. Martin