Re: python libraries vs. RPATH (vs. RUNPATH)

Martin Husemann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 01:10:14AM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> This works on a recentish current where lib-dynload/readline.so has
> RPATH instead of RUNPATH.
> 
> I vaguely remember we had a bit of a discussion abour RPATH
> vs. RUNPATH a few years ago.  Does anyone remember off-hand if the
> relevant fixes made it to -8?

Not offhand but I knew where to look ;-)

RCS file: /cvsroot/src/libexec/ld.elf_so/headers.c,v
Working file: headers.c
head: 1.70
[..]
	netbsd-9-2-RELEASE: 1.65.2.1
[..]
	netbsd-8: 1.61.0.8
[..]
----------------------------
revision 1.65
date: 2018-12-30 12:55:15 +0100;  author: martin;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -2;  commitid: OsrLtEI8DqY6KO5B;
branches:  1.65.2;
Add support for DT_RUNPATH - it is just the same as we always have treated
DT_RPATH.  Approved by core.
----------------------------

and according to my grep in 8's doc/CHANGES-* it has not been pulled up.

Martin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.