Re: <bsd.own.mk> variable naming convention for compiler warnings
Luke Mewburn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23-06-01 21:37, Christos Zoulas wrote: | In article <[email protected]>, | Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> wrote: | > | >> On May 31, 2023, at 4:46 AM, Luke Mewburn <[email protected]> wrote: | >> | >> Thoughts? | > | >Big improvement, IMO. | | I agree! I've updated <bsd.own.mk> and tools/compat/* to the new convention. I haven't converted much of the tree to it at this point. IMHO, the priority should be adapting any Makefiles that build HOST_ tools and need overrides for the native build. It is for further study to whether we adapt our existing builds of warning suppression (-Wno-foo) to specific non-fatal warnings that are printed (-Wno-error=foo). Feedback from other developers is that there are some directories where there has been an analysis to explicitly suppress warnings (-Wno-) versus show them non fatal (-Wno-error=).