Re: <bsd.own.mk> variable naming convention for compiler warnings

Luke Mewburn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 23-06-01 21:37, Christos Zoulas wrote:
  | In article <[email protected]>,
  | Jason Thorpe  <[email protected]> wrote:
  | >
  | >> On May 31, 2023, at 4:46 AM, Luke Mewburn <[email protected]> wrote:
  | >> 
  | >> Thoughts?
  | >
  | >Big improvement, IMO.
  | 
  | I agree!

I've updated <bsd.own.mk> and tools/compat/* to the new convention.

I haven't converted much of the tree to it at this point.
IMHO, the priority should be adapting any Makefiles that
build HOST_ tools and need overrides for the native build.

It is for further study to whether we adapt our existing builds of
warning suppression (-Wno-foo) to specific non-fatal warnings that are
printed (-Wno-error=foo).  Feedback from other developers is that there
are some directories where there has been an analysis to explicitly
suppress warnings (-Wno-) versus show them non fatal (-Wno-error=).
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.