Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug

Sorry for the top-post, reply below=E2=80=A6

-- thorpej
Sent from my iPhone.

> On May 24, 2026, at 8:33=E2=80=AFAM, Mouse <[email protected]> wr=
ote:
>=20
> Perhaps the gcc people are able-and-willing to do that.  But, if not, I
> still maintain that it is thereby unsuitable for the use case of
> building NetBSD.

I mean, I also find =E2=80=9Ccompiler people=E2=80=9D annoying in this regar=
d, but this doesn=E2=80=99t render the compiler =E2=80=9Cunsuitable=E2=80=9D=
.  Just fix the code and be done with it.  I do wish the compiler at least e=
mitted a warning, however, when a NULL-check is elided for this reason.=