Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> Thu, 28 May 2026 19:04:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On May 28, 2026, at 5:40=E2=80=AFPM, Greg A. Woods <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > The reason for the "belief" that UB is (often) related to optimizers = is > squarely resting on the fact that when the optimizer is turned off = then > the UB goes away. So it's not really a belief -- it's a demonstrable > fact! Eh.. The undefined behavior doesn=E2=80=99t go away, per se, it just is = undefined differently :-) Maybe a better say to state it is: =E2=80=9Cwhen the optimizer is turned = off, the unexpected behavior goes away=E2=80=9D. -- thorpej