Re: major/minor(3) macros conflict with regular code

On Sunday  9 Feb 2025, at 18:37, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I do think they belong with the definition of dev_t though, which I
> think means keep them where they are.

FWIW, I also raised the issue upstream:
https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-msgs/issues/484

If this can be somehow fixed there, that works too :)