Re: Nonfree fonts in xsrc
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mouse <[email protected]> writes: >> It's also not really that unusual for fonts (or art in general) to >> mandate the no-deriviatives clause. > > So? It's not that unusual for software to mandate > no-reverse-engineering, either. Each is nevertheless inappropriate for > a (supposedly-)open-source project. While I see your point, I find non-free binary blobs of firmware to be 1000x more important an issue than fonts. I do not think there is much appetite for a total purge of firmware.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQS7wyAjWilQwVHG9Vsf2nroCY7WDgUCX3sUVgAKCRAf2nroCY7W DgpKAKCDAbZDEx2RfiRu62cnmV/BaENqRQCdFk1E/Bexsi1pLRad1Sb7GKIxDnk= =cJkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----