Re: Backporting?
Chavdar Ivanov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG0OUxgVYT=nqmSGd+nQrUtWOzR3ey+jhjGaqTPGzUOz9Juedg@mail.gmail.com> |
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/97125/intel-core-i3-7101te-processor-3m-cache-3-40-ghz.html says "Intel® HD Graphics 630". On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 17:35, Robert Swindells <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> How difficult is it to backport xsrc? > >> > >> Would help if you said what kind of graphics card you want to use. > > > >Fair point. I was thinking of taking all - or almost - of xsrc, on the > >assumption that I'd get all the hardware support that's there, but if > >it's possible to pull in just the support for a particular piece, that > >might be easier. > > It is also that some architectures and graphics controllers are more > complicated to support. > > On amd64 and i386 you also need kernel code for the userland part to > be able to work. This kernel code should deal with the multiple output > devices. > > >8.0 reports it as > > The important bit is this: > > >vga0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: vendor 8086 product 5912 (rev. 0x04) > > So it is an Intel controller. > > >drm at vga0 not configured > > It doesn't look like the kernel recognizes the GPU. > > Can you check whether the "i915drmkms* ..." line is enabled in the > kernel config ? > > I think it will be easier to switch to 9.0, unless you also want to > backport everything under src/sys/external/bsd/drm2. -- ----