Re: Fonts (Was: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit)
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> Tue, 10 May 2022 01:07:03 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YnmQh/[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 17:11:58 +0000, David Holland wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote: > > > At higher DPIs, xterm can suitably 'enbolden' spleen that it looks > > > readable. Allowing it to 'make fonts bold' at lower DPIs obfuscates > > > the shape of letters too much IMO. > > > > Which brings us back to the question of why inflict this onto > > ourselves by using a font without a bold variant as the default? :) > > Obviously we should carry local patches for all legacy x11 programs > that don't know how to use modern fonts :-) http://terminus-font.sourceforge.net/ seems to be a decent option for a bitmap font. It's under SIL OFL, has good script coverage, a range of sizes and bold variant. It's the 9front's default font. -uwe