Re: protocols(5)

In article <[email protected]>,
Jan Schaumann  <[email protected]> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi,
>
>protocols(5) references "the DARPA Internet", which,
>at this point in time, seems outdated.  I'd like to
>propose to update the manual page to better describe
>the meaning of the entries in that file as well as to
>reference the relevant RFCs as indicated in the
>attached diff.
>
>(I'd be tempted to also include a pointer to
>https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/ as
>the authoritative source, but don't want to add a URL
>that may change with time.)
>
>Thoughts?

I think we could mention DARPA in the history section as homage, otherwise
fine.

christos