NetBSD 11 RC4
r0ller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi All,Since my earlier ~15 years old HDD started to show signs of its age, I have a fresh new install of NetBSD 11 RC4 on my box with a new hdd to test:-AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON MAX WIFI-2 Corsair 8gb DDR4 3200Mhz Vengeance Pro Black-radeon r9 nano 4GB video card-Seagate Barracuda 2TB sata3 hddIssues:1) Finally, amdgpu driver kicks in on boot unlike with earlier versions and seems to work fine although I get only 1024x768 resolution in X and I cannot get xrandr to pump it up to 1920x1080 (any help is appreciated). When adding new mode and set monitor to use it, I get the error: "configure crtc 0 failed".2) I can see a warning in dmesg which wasn't there with 10.1: "WARNING: 2 errors while detecting hardware; check system log". Those two seem to be the followings:"acpi0: autoconfiguration error: invalid PCI address for D012""acpi0: autoconfiguration error: invalid PCI address for D047"3) In rc.log, I get this, no clue why:/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=allStarting postfix.postfix: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=all/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=all/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=all/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=all/usr/libexec/postfix/post-install: Error: /etc/postfix/postfix-files is not a file.postfix/postlog: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=allpostfix/postlog: fatal: unable to create missing queue directoriespostfix/postlog: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 707: overriding earlier entry: inet_protocols=allpostfix/postlog: fatal: Postfix integrity check failed!/etc/rc.d/postfix exited with code 1Otherwise, everything runs fine. Thanks for the hard work to everyone involved!BR,r0ller