Re: fail to compile NetBSD current from Linux at second attempt
Ramiro Aceves <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:49:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
El 11/6/26 a las 13:33, Robert Elz escribió: > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:59:04 +0200 > From: Ramiro Aceves <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > | But after that success, I did a "cvs update -A -dP" in /NetBSD/usr/src > | and xsrc > | > | When building again it fails like this: > > Yes, that is one of the issues working with HEAD (current) - there are times > the sources simply don't build, because of other updates made or part made > (partly because of the nature of CVS, this should be less of a problem after > we are no longer using that as our primary revision control system). > > You simply need to wait a bit for the problem to be fixed, and update again. > > For the issue you detected, it should be OK now, but these things happen > all the time. > > Check out https://releng.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/build.cgi to see the cuurrent > state of the builds for the various branches (but note it can take several > hours after changes are made before anything shows up there), or for > some of the ports (architectures) you can get more specific info from > https://releng.netbsd.org/test-results.html - on that page just click > on the name of the architecture of interest, with the version of interest > (HEAD is current), if those exist there (not everything is covered) and > you'll get taken to a page with monthly build status graphs, where you > can see how often things are not building (and results from test runs, > where you can sometimes detect that although a version builds, it might > not work as desired - though problems with tests are often with the > tests themselves). > > kre Hello Robert, Thanks so much for your great and detailed explanation. No problem at all, just wanted to know wether I was doing something wrong. You all are doing a very valuable job. All of this appears to be very complicated (to the eyes of a regular user as I am ;-) ) Regards. Ramiro.