Re: wd interface CRC errors

Greg Oster <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.help
Message-ID <[email protected]>
David Maxwell writes:
> 
> I have a NetBSD 2.0.2, i386, with an uptime of 238 days. The install
> is about a year and a half old, running 24/7 since May 2005.
> 
> It has three WDs, and wd1/wd2 are a mirror. Nothing has changed
> physically in the system, so the usual 'cable problem' suggestion 
> doesn't seem to apply.

If you havn't already, I'd check that the cables are seated all the way... 
(I've had them work their way out a little over time, and cause these 
sorts of issues...)

> These started in September, and have become common:
> 
> Sep 19 08:58:28 mail /netbsd: wd0a: error writing fsbn 1114304 of 1114304-111
> 4319 (wd0 bn 1114367; cn 1105 tn 8 sn 23), retrying
> Sep 19 08:58:29 mail /netbsd: wd0: (aborted command, interface CRC error)
> Sep 19 08:58:29 mail /netbsd: wd0: soft error (corrected)
> 
> They show up on wd0 and wd1, which share a controller, and a cable. 
> All errors are corrected so far. (18 on wd0, 19 on wd1) 
> 
> All of the errors occur while writing, and there's no locality 
> amongst the sectors invovled in the errored writes.

Any "time-of-day" correlations (e.g. when /etc/daily is running?) 
which might speak to a heavy disk load (and hence power draw), and 
possibly to a power supply that is starting to fail? 
 
> The smart status shows a high count on wd0 for raw read error rate and
> hardware ECC recovered errors, so I'm inclined to replace that drive.

Be careful with these numbers from the SMART info... I've got a few Seagate
drives where the raw read error rate and hardware ECC recovered error rate 
move in lock-step, and at a rate of 6/second (when the drive is idle.  Much 
higher when the drive is active).  I don't have the URLs handy, but 
this is apparently a 'known issue' with some Seagate drives... 

You might run some of the tools from sysutils/smartmontools to see if 
they give any more info (and/or run the SMART diagnostic bits...).

Later...

Greg Oster
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.