Re: soekris box still keeps terrible time

On 16 Nov 2006, at 0:39, James K. Lowden wrote:

> David Lord wrote:
> > I use ntpd to sync to internet time. A few of my pcs have clocks too 
> > far out for ntpd to work effectively as the natural clock drift is at 
> > a greater rate than ntpd can lock to. The fix is to adjust the value 
> > of TIMER_FREQ in kernel configuration to offset the system clock 
> > drift. I aim for within -10 ppm to 0 ppm. Of course temperature and 
> > power supply voltage can cause fairly wide variation so near is good 
> > enough vs >>500 ppm drifts of some pcs. Other pcs are within 30 ppm 
> > without any tweaking. 
> > 
> > eg. from K6X400_0.32
> > ! # K6X400 is approx -60 ppm so aim for > +50ppm change
> > ! # default 1193182
> > ! # for +68
> > ! options  TIMER_FREQ=1193250
> 
> Thank you, David.  This is very helpful, if still a bit mysterious. 
> Here's what I'm seeing:
> 
> cherry$ grep ntpd /var/log/messages |head 
> Nov 15 11:09:29 cherry ntpd[29870]: time reset -2.326574 s
> Nov 15 11:09:29 cherry ntpd[29870]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds
> tolerance 500 PPM
> Nov 15 11:14:53 cherry ntpd[29870]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds
> tolerance 500 PPM
> Nov 15 11:34:10 cherry ntpd[29870]: time reset -3.754409 s
> Nov 15 11:34:10 cherry ntpd[29870]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds
> tolerance 500 PPM
> Nov 15 11:39:33 cherry ntpd[29870]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds
> tolerance 500 PPM
> Nov 15 11:54:35 cherry ntpd[29870]: time reset -2.699728 s
> Nov 15 11:54:35 cherry ntpd[29870]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds
> tolerance 500 PPM
> Nov 15 11:59:57 cherry ntpd[29870]: frequency error -512 PPM exceeds
> tolerance 500 PPM
> Nov 15 12:16:59 cherry ntpd[29870]: time reset -3.915989 s
> 
> cherry$ config -x /netbsd | grep TIMER  
> options         TIMER_FREQ=1189200
> 
> I don't know what units TIMER_FREQ is in.  Taking a naive guess, I add 512
> to it, giving me 1189712.  Since you suggest overcompensating, perhaps
> 1189800?  
> 
> Is that the idea?  

Exactly.

It usually takes me a few of shots at it but I normally trim down the 
kernel in several steps anyway to add extra features and remove any 
not required.

David